Floyd Law Offices PLLC
Contact Us Today! 919.336.1895

Accused Of Theft?

Put A Trial-Tested Advocate In Your Corner

Get Started With A Free Consultation

Raleigh Theft Crime Attorney

We Never Back Down From A Fight: (919) 336-1895

While a theft charge may seem minor, the repercussions will negatively affect you and your family. If you have been criminally charged with theft, it is critical that you take swift action in order to defend yourself. The penalties for serious theft-related offenses are severe. As such, we encourage you to retain the immediate representation of Floyd Law Offices PLLC. Our Raleigh criminal defense attorney has successfully handled countless theft crime cases. With our in-depth legal knowledge in your corner, you can be confident that your case is in capable and competent hands. Call (919) 336-1895 today to learn how we can help you.

In order to avoid a criminal conviction, you need to ensure your constitutional rights are protected in a court of law. Our Raleigh theft law firm has a unique understanding of both sides of the courtroom. With our support, you may be able to obtain the upper hand in court. We will thoroughly investigate the circumstances pertaining to your case, discover what evidence the prosecution has obtained, and prepare a strong defense accordingly.
Discuss Your Options With Our Lawyer
  • Meet Chris Floyd

    Criminal Defense Attorney

    Chris Floyd is a seasoned criminal lawyer with years of trial and litigation experience. He has represented people from all walks of life, and has defended thousands of criminal cases. He has tried and won not guilty verdicts in cases that have ranged from misdemeanors to first-degree murder.

    Chris’ experience is unique in the sense that he is not a former prosecutor. In fact, he has never prosecuted a criminal case. Instead, he is a career criminal defense lawyer who has sat behind the defense table, and fought for the accused in every case he has handled.

    Chris is a member of the North Carolina State Bar and is admitted to practice before all North Carolina State Courts and several federal courts, including the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, and the Supreme Court of the United States.

The Attorney to Call When Your Freedom is on the Line

What Our Clients Are Saying

  • “Chris Floyd told me that he "would fight for me." He successfully got a larceny charge dismissed. HIRE Chris Floyd because the other attorneys want to make a quick buck but Chris Floyd will work hard and fight for you!”

  • “Handled my DUI case with the most uttermost professionalism. Highly recommended. Young, smart and aggressive lawyer. Was easily accessible and defends you to the end.”

    Edgar

  • “Chris is an amazing attorney. Not only is he available day and night but he is also very professional and detailed oriented. Young and eager but also smart and responsible. Drug possession AND DUI both dismissed with no penalty. Couldn't be happier. ”

    Crystal

  • “He is amazing and without going into detail , my charges were serious and he was able to have them dismissed and he is helping me get them expunged.”

    Carol

Standing Up for The Criminally-Accused

Case Wins & Victories

  • State of North Carolina v. A.L - DWI

    Not Guilty

    Charge: Driving While Impaired (DWI) Client was pulled over for speeding and charged with Driving While Impaired after failing standardized field sobriety tests and blowing over the legal limit on both a preliminary breath test and on the Intox EC/IR II breathalyzer machine. This client had a previous DWI conviction within seven years and was facing mandatory jail time.

  • State of North Carolina v. K.H. - DWI

    Dismissed

    Charges: Driving While Impaired and Speeding. Client was charged with DWI and speeding after she was pulled over for speeding and subsequently failed all standardized field sobriety test and blew well over the legal limit. After she was arrested, she allegedly refused to submit to a chemical analysis. If she was found to have willfully refused the chemical analysis, her license would be take from her for one year even if she was acquitted of DWI. Defendant requested a hearing on the refusal with the DMV, which was held, and demanded a trial on her case. At trial, the defense objected to the State’s motion to continue, which was denied by the court.

  • State of North Carolina v. A.M. - Criminal Defense

    Not Guilty

    Charges: Violation of a Domestic Violence Protective Order Client was charged with violating a domestic violence protective order and for being in contempt of court. After a hearing, the Judge found the accusing witness to not be credible.

  • State of North Carolina v. L.C. - DWI

    Dismissed

    Charges: DWI and Reckless Driving to Endanger Client was charged with Driving while impaired and reckless driving after she was alleged to have caused an accident that resulted in the hospitalization of multiple people. Due to the facts of the case, a conviction would have resulted in mandatory active jail sentence.

  • State of North Carolina v. B.W. - DWI

    Dismissed

    Charge: Driving While Impaired (DWI) Client accused of Driving While Impaired after he was stopped for speeding and allegedly exhibiting poor driving. Client was alleged to have failed standardized field sobriety tests and blew over the legal limit on a preliminary breath test and on the Intox EC/IR II breathalyzer machine after his arrest.

  • State of North Carolina v. L.L. - DWI

    Voluntarily Dismissed

    Charge: Driving While Impaired (DWI) Client accused of Driving While Impaired after he drove through a checkpoint, failed all standardized field sobriety tests, and blew over the legal limit on the Intox EC/IR II breathalyzer machine.

Results - Driven. Client - Focused.

The Powerful Defense Attorney You Deserve in Your Corner

  • Solid Track Record of Success

  • Flexible Payment Plans

  • Confident in the Courtroom

  • Free Case Evaluations

Send Us a Message

You Need Answers. We Can Help You Get Them.

  • How Are Robbery & Burglary Different?

    Answer:

    Robbery is the taking of property against an individuals will by means of fear or force. Robbery offenses are also referred to as “stickups” or “muggings.” Unlike robbery, a burglary offense does not require a confrontation between two or more parties. In order to be convicted of burglary, the prosecutor is required to prove that the defendant entered the structure with the intent of committing a felony offense.

  • Is The Police Officer Required To Ready My Rights?

    Answer:

    Police officers are not legally required to read you your rights at the time of your arrest. The Miranda Warning is only required if the officer plans to use your statement as elicit, incriminating evidence in a court of law.

  • Do I Need To Hire A Criminal Defense Lawyer?

    Answer:

    If you have been arrested for a serious theft offense, it is vital that you secure the legal representation of our lawyer. We urge you against self-representation. When your future on the line, you need a skilled attorney on your side. Regardless of the circumstances pertaining to your case, there is no question that an attorney will make all the difference in the outcome of your case.

Don’t Hesitate. Fight Back Today!

Request Your Free, Confidential Consultation.

    • Please enter your name.
    • This isn't a valid email address.
      Please enter your email address.
    • This isn't a valid phone number.
      Please enter your phone number.
      You entered an invalid number.
    • Please select an option.
    • Please enter a message.

Rights That Are in Jeopardy After Being Convicted

  • Loss of eligibility to apply for financial aid for college
  • Security clearance for certain professions such as teaching, working with children, or security
  • Voting privileges
  • Parenting rights can be taken away including custody & visiting rights
  • Loss of 2nd Amendment right to legally obtain or possess firearms
  • Cannot obtain a passport or a visa for entry into certain countries
  • Convicts are pulled into police line-ups as a potential suspect